Building owners and developers face crucial decisions when specifying security measures for their properties. With various standards governing the performance of security doors, understanding key differences becomes vital.
Two prominent standards, LPS 1175 and EN 1627, offer distinct approaches to defining security resistance. We explore their unique characteristics and applications.
The Loss Prevention Standard (LPS) 1175, published by the Loss Prevention Certification Board (LPCB), is a rigorous UK standard focusing on the physical security of intruder-resistant building components. It covers a wide range of products, including revolving doors and security portals.
Issue 8 is the latest version of LPS 1175, introducing significant updates from Issue 7. These changes reflect the evolving landscape of tools available to criminals, considering factors such as tool size, accessibility, portability, power, and effectiveness.
Issue 8 employs new criteria for defining security ratings, enabling application across a broader spectrum of threat scenarios. This supports the implementation of layered security approaches by specifiers to create extended delays against criminals prepared to use force.
The European Standard EN 1627-30:2011 serves as a burglar resistance classification system for various security products, including revolving doors and security portals. It defines six resistance classes, ranging from RC1 to RC6, with increasing levels of resistance.
EN 1627 specifically focuses on resistance to burglary, a subset of criminal intent, while LPS 1175 encompasses a broader scope that includes intrusion by criminals, terrorists, activists, or protesters.
The difference in scope has led to notable variations in the methods used to define the conducted tests, the range of tools employed, their utilisation during testing, and the achieved results.
When comparing LPS 1175 and EN 1627, several key differences emerge:
The choice between LPS 1175 and EN 1627 depends on the specific security requirements, risk profile, and regulatory obligations of each project. By carefully evaluating these factors and consulting with security experts, building owners and developers can make informed decisions that optimise the protection of their assets and occupants.
While LPS 1175 and EN 1627 both offer valuable guidance in assessing the performance of security products, their distinct testing methods, and rating systems cater to different priorities and risk scenarios.
At Bradbury Group, we understand the critical role security doors play in protecting buildings and their occupants. Our range of security doors is engineered to meet the most stringent industry standards, including LPS 1175.
Our M2M2, M2M3, and M2M4 doors are certified to LPS 1175 SR2, SR3, and SR4, respectively, providing exceptional resistance against intruders. These doors are designed to withstand prolonged attacks using a wide array of tools, ensuring the highest level of protection for your premises.
Contact Bradbury Group today to discuss how our LPS 1175 compliant security doors can fortify your building’s defences and provide uncompromising protection.
